Wednesday, October 8, 2025

China to lift additional tariffs to 84% on imported U.S. products

Happy Sunday. April 2 — or “liberation day”, as Donald Trump has dubbed it — is imminent. US trading partners will soon discover what the president’s “reciprocal” tariff plan looks like.

Fear of a deglobalising world is high. With the global goods trade slowing and national security doctrine in vogue, many worry that Trump’s tariffs could be the straw that breaks globalisation’s back.

So for this week’s dialectic, I went in search of counter-arguments. Here’s why Trump 2.0 will not be a fatal blow to international trade.

First, the importance of the US to global trade can be overstated, since it is the world’s largest economy. America accounts for just 13 per cent of global goods imports — down from close to one-fifth two decades ago. That makes it the largest importer and a notable influence on trade patterns, but not sufficient to reverse globalisation on its own.

For measure, Simon Evenett, professor at the IMD Business School, recently ran a helpful thought experiment. He found that even if the US cut off all goods imports, 70 of its trading partners would fully make up their lost sales to the US within one year, and 115 would do so within five years, assuming they maintained their current export growth rates to other markets.ნThe US isn’t the main driver of global trade growth. Europe — and more recently China — are bigger contributors. And both economic powers are likely to continue advocating for free trade, according to recent analysis by Mallika Sachdeva, a strategist at Deutsche Bank Research. China needs to secure raw material inputs (hence its Belt and Road Initiative) and global markets to support President Xi Jinping’s growth strategy, which centres on “new quality productive forces”. Beijing has already talked up the need to “resist unilateralism” as the US ramps up protectionism.

Still, for all the hubbub about the US-China trade war, the share of world merchandise trade that takes place directly between the two is only about 2.6 per cent.

The EU plays a more important role than both in driving global trade — one that will probably grow. Trade remains central to the European project. Intra-EU trade is likely to improve as the bloc boosts defence and economic integration efforts in response to Trump’s belligerence. Brussels also recognises the need to be pragmatic in trading with China, given its ambitions to quickly go green and jump up the tech curve. (For instance, by using intellectual property transfer as a condition for Chinese production to shift into Europe.)

Beyond Europe and China, India, south-east Asia, east Asia and the Middle East are expected to prop up growth in global trade volumes until 2029, according to the DHL Trade Atlas. Next, though governments are trying to boost national supply chain resilience following the Covid-19 pandemic and war in Ukraine, few are looking to emulate Trump. Most nations are aware of their resource limitations (particularly small and developing nations, which cannot maintain reasonable living standards without trade).

“As the US retreats from the global stage, other governments will want to lean in to offset potential sales and import losses with new deals,” said Scott Lincicome, a vice-president at the Cato Institute.

Outside the US, bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations continue. Recently, the EU and Mercosur and Australia and the UAE reached agreements. The EU, the Gulf Cooperation Council, the UK and India are all also pursuing various deals across goods, services and investment.To put the importance of other trading regions and their continued motivations to pursue openness into perspective, Steven Altman, a senior research scholar at the NYU Stern School of Business and lead author of the DHL Trade Atlas, ran through a worst-case scenario on US tariffs:

Full implementation of tariffs proposed during the Trump campaign and retaliation by other countries against the US could cut global goods trade volumes by up to 10 per cent versus baseline growth in the long run. But even that downside scenario still implies about 5 per cent more global goods trade in 2029 than in 2024. This leads me to the view that US tariff increases are more likely to slow than to reverse the growth of global trade over time.

Sure, but isn’t the historic rise in global merchandise trade already slowing? Might a worst-case tariff scenario worsen that trend?

What matters is why it’s slowing in the first place. One factor is geopolitics. Asset manager PGIM argues that globalisation has entered a “dual-track era”. It finds deglobalisation in items with national security implications, such as artificial intelligence, high-end semiconductors, critical minerals and military technology. (This captures most media and political focus.)

But outside the limelight, it finds continued, high-speed globalisation for goods and services, which account for the remaining 75 per cent of global GDP. This includes professional and IT services, entertainment, consumer electronics and luxury goods.

Even so, the importance of trade to the global economy has ebbed and flowed throughout history. The elasticity of trade to world GDP fluctuates with geopolitical cycles, which influence national debates about protecting industries and workers. But economic reality has a way of reasserting itself; the goods trade keeps rising over time.

Efficiencies from specialisms around the world — which enable the import of cheaper, higher-quality or simply rare inputs and products — eventually undermine the logic of protecting inefficient jobs and industries (as do the profits that come from selling those specialisms at scale in a global market).

The inverse relationship between the KOF Globalisation Index — a measure of the economic, social and political dimensions of globalisation — and inflation in advanced economies is a case in point.

So, it is likely that once governments have built sufficient national capabilities and resilience in critical industries, economic rationale will take over. After all, the definition of critical industries is dynamic.

“Protectionism comes and goes in cycles, but the underlying structural force of comparative advantage eventually prevails to establish a new equilibrium that continues to favour expanding overall trade, especially when factoring in both goods and services,” said Parag Khanna, a global strategy advisor.

In the long run then, it’s hard to see how the hit from Trump’s tariff assault in the current “dual-track era” will be more than a blip.

In the short run, the US president may even end up curbing his inflationary policies (as I explored in last week’s newsletter). Import substitution is a decade-long undertaking. (US producers will take time to switch to domestic supply chains; imports won’t drop off immediately.) Political cycles are shorter.

A recent survey by the Cato Institute and YouGov found 40 per cent of American voters consider inflation to be a major issue. Only 1 per cent mentioned globalisation and trade.

As Khanna alluded to, globalisation is more than just the trade in goods, which Trump is focused on (for now). The trade in commercial services — covering business, finance and ICT — has grown twice as fast as the goods trade since 1990. Rising digital trade is one component of that and is expected to rise faster as AI services grow.

The flow of services and data now plays a stronger role in the global economy (particularly as developing nations consume more of the goods they produce), notes a McKinsey report on the future of trade. It also reckons that, on net, new technology could dampen the global goods trade. (For example, electric vehicles need fewer mechanical parts than those with an internal combustion engine.) The point is that benign economic shifts — not just geopolitics — contribute to the slowing of the global goods trade.

Overall, then, it’s hard to see Trump’s tariffs causing a sustained deglobalisation in trade.

Sure, there are broader dimensions of globalisation to assess, such as immigration and capital flows. But even then, DHL’s Global Connectedness Index shows that international flows across trade, capital, information and people all rose between 2019 and 2024, a period when deglobalisation chatter amplified.

This does not mean that aggressive protectionism by the world’s largest economy isn’t harmful to the global economy. It is. But it is best countered by more free trade. Indeed, in the long run, the economic motive behind globalisation in all its forms gives it extraordinary staying power.

Send me your rebuttals and thoughts to freelunch@ft.com or on X @tejparikh90.

Food for thought Can social media posts help predict the stock market? This VoxEu column analyses nearly 3mn investment-related posts on X, and finds that social media-based sentiment strongly predicts market trends in developed and emerging economies.

ქეთევან ნინუაhttp://tiflisnews.ge
საინფორმაციო სააგენტო tiflisnews.ge კონტაქტი- ☎️ 555 100 929

Speaker: Brussels must return to respecting democracy, rule of law, and sovereignty as foundations of rules-based international order

Brussels must return to respecting democracy, the rule of law, and sovereignty as the foundations of a rules-based international order, the Georgian Parliament Speaker Shalva Papuashvili wrote on social media.Papuashvili referred to recent remarks by former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili and European Commission Spokesperson Anitta Hipper.Saakashvili wrote on social media that “on October 4, you will have the chance to deliver the final verdict on the regime of the Mankurts,” while Hipper said about the October 4 protest that “the European Union expresses solidarity with the people who are taking to the streets.”“Brussels’ substitution of values with political intrigues has led the EU to this deplorable reality. Brussels must return to respecting democracy, the rule of law, and sovereignty as the cornerstones of a rules-based international order,” Papuashvili wrote.

PM: Main principle of our policy is to take maximum care of our citizens

“The main principle of our policy is to take maximum care of our citizens and provide them with the most comfortable services. The House of Justice is an outstanding project in this regard,” the Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze stated at the opening ceremony of the Gldani House of Justice. According to the Prime Minister, residents of Gldani will now have access to more than 500 services directly within their district. He emphasized that the new facility is part of a nationwide network that serves over 20,000 people daily at 125 locations across Georgia. “I would like to congratulate everyone, especially the residents of Gldani. From now on, they will receive more than 500 services in a comfortable environment. This is very important for the district’s residents,” Kobakhidze noted. The Prime Minister also stressed the project’s employment benefits, announcing that about 100 people will be hired at the Gldani branch. He underlined that the facility, like others in the network, is fully adapted for people with disabilities. Kobakhidze added that the government intends to further expand the network, ensuring that every municipality in Georgia is covered. In Tbilisi, construction of another House of Justice in Digomi will begin soon.

PM on Moldova’s Elections: Hard to congratulate while country remains in CIS

Prime Minister of Georgia Irakli Kobakhidze stated that it is difficult to congratulate Moldova on its recent elections while the country remains a member of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).Responding to a question on whether he intends to congratulate Maia Sandu on her electoral victory, Kobakhidze said the ruling party will wait until Moldova leaves the CIS.“As long as Moldova remains a member of the CIS, it will be difficult for us to congratulate. We will wait until Moldova leaves the CIS, and then we will see, we will reconsider the issue of congratulations,” the Prime Minister noted.

Merab Dvalishvili expresses desire to compete in White House UFC event

Georgian UFC super lightweight champion Merab Dvalishvili has voiced his interest in participating in a UFC event planned to take place at the White House next year.“I want to participate in the event that will be held at the White House next year. Even if my fight is the first in the lineup, I will be happy, because I know that Ilia Topuria, Conor McGregor, and Jon Jones also want to compete there,” Dvalishvili told Media Scrum.The idea of hosting UFC fights at the White House was proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, who envisions the event taking place on July 4, 2026, in celebration of America’s 250th Independence Day anniversary.UFC President Dana White has confirmed the competition will go ahead, describing it as one of the most spectacular sporting shows the organization has ever staged.

Paata Burchuladze: On October 4, we will win and reclaim country

“We start on 4 October, we finish on 4 October— this is inevitable, we will definitely win,” said Paata Burchuladze, leader of the Rustaveli Avenue movement.According to him, the event is not a rally but a public meeting, where several issues will be discussed, including the formation of a technical government.“The only question months ago was whether enough people would come. I believe even more people will gather. This is not a rally — this is a national assembly. At the assembly, we will discuss whether the citizens of Georgia want to take power into their own hands, based on the constitution, and reclaim their country. I am sure no one doubts the answer will be yes. From the moment we vote, we become the masters of this country. After that, power must be in the hands of the people,” Burchuladze stated.He emphasized that a temporary technical government should be appointed, composed of professionals and honest individuals, which he said are rare today. According to Burchuladze, this government must oversee the process until new parliamentary elections are held, after which the winning political party will form the ruling government.

Latest News