“For some reason, Maia Sandu thinks she has some moral, political or ideological superiority to speak to the Georgian people in this tone,” stated the Speaker of Parliament, Shalva Papuashvili.
According to him, hearing anti-Georgian rhetoric from the Moldovan President is outrageous.
“First and foremost, let me remind you that Maia Sandu is the person who supported the process of overthrowing the government on October 4. When the presidential palace was under violent assault, at that very moment, she publicly supported the group participating in the overthrow of the government. This demonstrates what values this person stands for.
It is also highly doubtful that Maia Sandu does this on her own initiative. Once a year, she remembers us and, for some reason, perceives herself as having the moral, political, or ideological superiority to speak to the Georgian people in this manner.
When we hear such anti-Georgian rhetoric from Moldova’s President, it is utterly outrageous, and it requires a response. We probably should have had a clear response at the time, beyond statements, when Moldova’s President openly supported the groups participating in the overthrow of the government.
Maia Sandu is a person who supports the abolition of her own state. Therefore, I don’t think we have anything to discuss regarding state values. Allow me to remind you of her motivation: her justification was that Moldova is a small state, and a small state cannot survive on its own; therefore, it must join a larger state, rather than acknowledging any cultural or national connection between the Moldovan and Romanian peoples. When a head of state says she considers her country so insignificant that it must be abolished to survive, it is a fact that in terms of values, we are in different orbits,” Papuashvili stated.
For reference, Moldova’s President, Maia Sandu, stated during her address to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe that “Russia pulled Georgia back into its orbit by weaponising the fear of war, signalling that the wrong electoral choice would come at the cost of peace.”

